Rugby league is no stranger to big-money contracts, bold decisions, and career-defining moments. But in the case of Zac Lomax, the narrative around his future took a dramatic twist following his sensational display in the Kangaroos’ recent win. What should have been a night purely about celebrating his rise on the international stage has instead reignited debate about what many are calling a $2.6 million career blunder.
Lomax, one of the most naturally gifted players in the NRL, has long been regarded as a potential superstar. His combination of speed, strength, and a knack for pulling off the spectacular has made him a fan favourite and a constant talking point in league circles. But behind his latest standout performance lies a career decision that continues to attract scrutiny — one that might have cost him millions.
In the Kangaroos’ win, Lomax was unstoppable. Whether it was his powerful carries, slick footwork, or defensive grit, he looked every bit like a player destined for greatness on the biggest stage. Commentators and fans alike couldn’t stop raving about his dominance, with some even labelling him the best on ground. His influence was undeniable, and he showed why many coaches and talent scouts had once predicted he could become one of the highest-paid backs in the game.
However, the glow of his international success quickly brought to the surface the financial decision that has hung over his career. Years ago, Lomax reportedly turned down a lucrative offer that could have netted him close to $2.6 million in guaranteed earnings. At the time, his choice was framed around loyalty, personal preference, and belief in his development path. But in hindsight, critics argue it was a costly misstep.
The NRL landscape is a brutal one when it comes to player valuations. A single injury, a dip in form, or a club’s shifting roster needs can dramatically affect a player’s worth. For Lomax, who has endured periods of inconsistency and struggled to lock down his best position, the decision not to cash in at the height of his market value has been painted as a mistake. And with every dominant outing like the one for the Kangaroos, fans and pundits are left asking the same question: what if?
Supporters of Lomax point out that money isn’t everything. His commitment to developing his game, representing his state, and now starring for his country shows his priorities extend beyond the dollar signs. In fact, the Kangaroos’ win may prove to be the launching pad for him to regain bargaining power and secure a fresh deal that reflects his current form.
On the other hand, critics argue that professional sport has a short shelf life. Players have only a limited window to maximize their earnings, and turning down a deal of that magnitude can never truly be justified. With contracts often tied to performance consistency rather than potential, Lomax’s decision may haunt him long after his playing days are over.
For now, though, the focus remains on his dazzling display in green and gold. If he continues to perform at this level, Zac Lomax may well rewrite his own story, turning what is now seen as a $2.6 million blunder into the springboard for a career renaissance.
What’s certain is that the rugby league world will be watching closely.